Ex-DAP man slams ‘Lim dynasty’ ally

By Athi Shankar

In DAP, disciplinary action is only taken against those who are ‘not closely linked’ to the Lim Dynasty, claims a former grassroot leader.

GEORGE TOWN: A former DAP grassroots leader has slammed party disciplinary committee (DC) chairman Tan Kok Wai as a ‘mere loyal servant’ to the party’s fast emerging and dominant “Lim Dynasty”.

Tan Tuan Tat, who resigned from the party yesterday, said Kok Wai had only been a blind canine or rather ball polisher for the dynasty, especially to secure his Cheras MP seat for seven terms.

Lim Dynasty is a popular political idiom expressed by DAP grassroots to taunt the internal faction led by party’s national advisor Lim Kit Siang and his son and secretary general Guan Eng.

Tan, who was a DAP member of 18 years, said Kok Wai was not qualified to head the five-man DC given his limited educational background.

“It was not a surprise that DAP national chairman Karpal Singh blasted Kok Wai as unfit to be the DC chairman.

“Kok Wai is not a lawyer, but trying to be one.

“But what can the grassroots members do?” asked Tan.

Yesterday Kok Wai hinted that Tan resigned after he was charged with forging 149 membership forms to form three pro-tem branches in Sungai Pelek.

“These people from Sungai Pelek and elsewhere had attended an event and their MyKads were used to sign them up as party members without their knowledge,” he said.

Tan, a former Selangor DAP publicity secretary, has however challenged Kok Wai to publicly identify the said event.

“Or else he should stop speaking like a child,” said the former DAP chairman of Taman Sri Sungai Pelek branch.

Disciplinary actions

Tan alleged that the only reason he, like many others before him, had been slapped with disciplinary action was due to his close links with DAP central executive committee member and Selangor assembly speaker Teng Chang Khim, an arch rival to Guan Eng.

Due to his own high education background, capabilities and abilities, Tan claimed that he was seen as a threat by those in the dynasty.

“DAP teaches and encourages freedom of expression to the world.

“But internally, it uses DC as a Guan Eng’s political tool to silence vocal members with dissenting views,” he alleged.

The former Sepang DAP parliamentary liaison committee member rejected a councilor nomination for Sepang municipality prior to quitting party.

Tan said the dynasty perpetuators were good in their standard operating procedure (SOP) of defaming, blaming, betraying, launching personal attacks and disseminating misinformation to mislead public.

He jibed at them to incorporate their SOP into the party constitution and Guan Eng’s CAT policy of competency, accountability and transparency.

He also alleged that the DC had been selective and bias in its prosecution.

He cited that former Klang municipal councillor Tee Boon Hock was sacked for issuing supporting letter, but Taiping MP Ngar Kor Ming, who is closely linked to the Lim Dynasty, was not expelled for the same offence.

He rapped Kok Wai for not having held a DC probe or taken firm and stern punitive actions on those close to Lim Dynasty such as Lee Kee Hiong, Tiew Wai Kheng, Serdang MP Teo Nie Ching and Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy.

“But others outside the dynasty were either sacked or resigned from the ‘Daddy Anak Party (DAP)’.

“Kok Wai has never served justice, but only served for his boss interests,” alleged Tan. – FMT

This entry was posted in DAP Updates. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Ex-DAP man slams ‘Lim dynasty’ ally

  1. KTWong87 says:

    Tan Tuan Tat “resigned from the party”?

    August 18th, 2012, Teresa Kok posted on her blog a Press Statement by Sivakumar a/l Periasamy, the coordinator of Sungai Pelek Pakatan Service Centre and the DAP Sepang Jaya Branch Chairman which stated:

    “…as the coordinator of Sg Pelek service centre and DAP Sepang Jaya branch
    chairman, confirms that disgraced and expelled former party member Tan Tuan
    Tat was sacked from the party because he created ‘phantom members’ to set up
    branches, and not for the reason he alleged to the press.”

    Tan Tuan Tat Was Sacked Because He Was Dishonest

    So is Tan telling the truth?

Comments are closed.